Select the right ballast water treatment system

Your choice of ballast water treatment system is important. It needs to be a perfect match for your vessel, ensuring smooth operations and unfailing compliance with environmental legislation. With Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1, you can be certain of both.

Your PureBallast 3.1 system

To match PureBallast 3.1 to your specifications, begin by selecting a flow rate. A few easy clicks are all it takes.

Ballast flow 0 - 1000 m3/h
Desired ballast flow
0 m3
87 m3
170 m3
Total capacity of system(s):
Number of pumps
No. of systems preferred
1 1
2 2
Skid mounted
1 Required
0 Not required

Send this Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1 recommendation together with technical facts to:

Please note: This summary of a Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1 system is based on your indicated needs.
The next step is to contact us to discuss your needs in greater detail and to agree on installation specifics.

Ballast flow 170 - 1000 m3/h
Desired ballast flow
170 m3
500 m3
1000 m3
Total capacity of system(s):
Number of pumps
No. of systems preferred
1 1
2 2
Ex classification
0 Not required
1 Required
Skid mounted
1 Required
0 Not required

Send this Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1 recommendation together with technical facts to:

Please note: This summary of a Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1 system is based on your indicated needs.
The next step is to contact us to discuss your needs in greater detail and to agree on installation specifics.

Ballast flow 1000 - 3000 m3/h
Desired ballast flow
1000 m3
2000 m3
3000 m3
Total capacity of system(s):
Number of pumps
No. of systems preferred
1 1
2 2
Ex classification
0 Not required
1 Required

Send this Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1 recommendation together with technical facts to:

Please note: This summary of a Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1 system is based on your indicated needs.
The next step is to contact us to discuss your needs in greater detail and to agree on installation specifics.

Ballast flow 3000 - 6000 m3/h
Desired ballast flow
3000 m3
4500 m3
6000 m3
Total capacity of system(s):
Number of pumps
No. of systems preferred
1 1
2 2
Ex classification
0 Not required
1 Required

Send this Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1 recommendation together with technical facts to:

Please note: This summary of a Alfa Laval PureBallast 3.1 system is based on your indicated needs.
The next step is to contact us to discuss your needs in greater detail and to agree on installation specifics.

Choosing a ballast water treatment system

There are key issues to explore when looking at ballast water treatment systems. The following selection guide can be of help.

A number of technologies exist for ballast water treatment. UV treatment is a common choice, but even UV-based systems differ significantly.

The 12 points below are key issues that should be discussed with any supplier. Click on each point for a full explanation.

1. Is the system type approved by both IMO and the U.S. Coast Guard?

The IMO Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention, which has now been ratified, serves as the main international guideline for ballast water treatment systems. Compliance with the BWM Convention is a must.

Moreover, it is important to look for a relatively recent IMO type approval certificate. The evaluation of systems has developed since the BWM Convention was adopted in 2004. Certificates issued by authorized third-party bodies now provide more details about the testing, as well as information concerning the system operating limitations.

In addition, a range of national and regional regulations have now come into play, most notably the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Ballast Water Discharge Standard. In order to deballast in United States waters, a vessel’s ballast water treatment system must be type approved by the USCG or approved as an Alternate Management System (AMS).

Compliance with USCG legislation is important even for vessels that are not affected by it directly, because it affects their potential resale value. If a vessel’s ballast water treatment system does not have USCG approval, it will be difficult to sell to any buyer who wants to operate in this key market.

In examining both IMO and USCG type approvals, it is important to look for certificates that are issued by an authorized third party. This will ensure greater validity and increased transparency. (See question 2).

2. Has water with naturally occurring organisms been used in certification?

It is important that any type approval certificate is issued by an authorized third party, so as to ensure a controlled testing environment and realistic test conditions. Without third-party transparency, the door may be opened for technological shortcuts.

For example, organisms that live close to the water surface are more resistant to UV light and therefore best treated by means of medium-pressure UV lamps. By using a uniform mixture of selected and cultivated organisms, these difficult organisms can simply be removed from the equation. In the real world, however, water is not regulated and the organisms are both tougher and more varied.

Serious suppliers, who understand the real-world implications of non-compliance, choose robust UV technology, seek third-party transparency and pro-actively stress their systems. Natural water with non-cultivated organisms like polychaetes, rotifers and shrimp should be used, ideally in the presence of difficulties such as algae blooms.

3. Is the system specifically designed for marine use?

Surprising as it may seem, most ballast water treatment systems have their roots in drinking water treatment on land. Their technology has thus been adapted to the marine environment, rather than developed for it.

In contrast to land-based UV treatment systems, which are preceded by other cleaning processes, ballast water treatment systems face difficult organisms, irregular water quality, higher temperatures and long periods of standstill with saline water inside them. A system specifically designed for marine conditions will be better equipped for these challenges.

4. Will the system’s key components resist corrosion in seawater?

The key components of many ballast water treatment systems are made of lower-grade materials, such as 316L steel. While 316L is a common engineering material, it is also one that corrodes in contact with seawater. A UV treatment reactor, which is filled with seawater throughout the treatment process, may corrode in as little as five years if made of 316L – thus necessitating an expensive replacement.

If built with a material like 254 SMO steel, which effectively resists seawater corrosion, a treatment system’s key components can be expected to last much longer. UV reactors of 254 SMO, for example, can last up to 20 years or more.

5. Does the system make maximum use of produced UV light?

Part of making UV treatment biologically effective and energy efficient is ensuring that all UV light produced by the lamps actually reaches the targeted organisms. The reactor’s internal construction should ensure a high and even distribution of the UV light, as well as high turbulence in the water passing through it. This will make certain that all organisms receive a concentrated dose.

In low-clarity waters, where UV transmittance is lower, even stronger measures are required. The use of specially designed lamp sleeves of synthetic quartz will support transmission of a broader wavelength spectrum and provide more UV light for disinfection. (See question 6).

6. Can the system perform in low-clarity waters without reducing flow?

Low-clarity water, i.e. water with a UV transmittance value of ≤55%, poses huge difficulties for most UV-based ballast water treatment systems. Many cannot treat this water at all, and most of those that can must reduce their flow rate to do so. This means slower operations when ballasting or deballasting in many of the world’s ports.

To perform well in waters with low UV transmittance, a system will need advanced filtration to improve the quality of the water for treatment. In addition, it will need to make maximum use of the UV light it produces. This will depend on the reactor’s internal construction (see question 5), as well as the reactor lamp sleeves, which should be of synthetic rather than natural quartz. Well-designed synthetic quartz lamp sleeves will support transmission of a broader wavelength spectrum and provide more UV light – including the shortest and most reactive UV wavelengths.

Ideally, the ballast water treatment system should also have power in reserve, so that it can be ramped up to handle the most difficult UV transmittance scenarios (see question 7).

7. Does the system offer effective power management?

Power management is a partly a question of energy efficiency. Naturally, a ballast water treatment system should use the least possible amount of power to ensure compliance.

However, power management is also a matter of biological disinfection performance. While the system should operate efficiently, it should also have a significant amount of power in reserve. This will allow it to ramp up for the most difficult scenarios, e.g. waters with extremely low UV transmittance (see question 6).

Without ramp-up capabilities, a system may compromise vessel operations in difficult waters. At best, it may slow ballast operations by substantially reducing the ballast water flow rate. At worst, it may prevent entry into these waters at all.

8. Does the system have an automatic Cleaning-In-Place (CIP) cycle?

Without some form of cleaning, deposits of calcium carbonate and metal ions will build up on the quartz sleeves of the UV lamps in a ballast water treatment system. This will impair treatment, since less of the UV light produced by the lamps will be able to pass through.

Mechanical wiping is an alternative to CIP, but wipers are ineffective against the build-up of metal ions, which must be removed with a low-pH fluid. Nor do they clean the UV sensor within the reactor, which measures the UV transmittance. If the sensor is dirty, the system may use more power than necessary or be otherwise poorly controlled.

Any form of mechanical cleaning – including manual cleaning – will also lead to sleeve scratches. Eventually, these too will degrade the treatment performance.

Simply put, tests have shown that CIP has a valuable role in maintaining the biological disinfection performance of a ballast water treatment system. In a UV-based system, the effects are noticeable after a single cleaning operation.

9. Are comprehensive monitoring and hardwired safety functions present?

Safety is paramount on board. This is one reason for choosing a UV-based ballast water treatment system, rather than one reliant on chemicals. Even a UV treatment system, however, must be built with safety in mind.

Monitoring of all major components is a must. For example, the position of all valves should be indicated via feedback. The reactor itself should have both temperature and level sensors (preferably in a double setup), and there should be a hardwired shutdown function in the event of overheating or low water level. The latter can prevent serious damage to the equipment in the event of a malfunction.

10. Is the system automatic and easy for an operator to understand?

Though the number and complexity of onboard systems is increasing, the available time and overall competence of crews is not. This makes automatic operation essential for any ballast water treatment system. One-button starts and stops, without manual intervention during operation, are the ideal.

A graphical user interface, rather than a text-based interface, can provide a clearer overview that facilitates correct decisions and use by international crews. For maximum overview and flexibility, the control system should be possible to incorporate into the vessel’s Integrated Ship Control System.

11. Does the system’s supplier have demonstrated capabilities?

As with any major installation, the supplier’s ability to deliver on time is critical to avoiding additional costs. Installing a ballast water treatment system is an especially complex undertaking, especially when done as a retrofit. Multiple parties are often involved, which means the supplier must be able to work with many partners and to provide strong project management when needed.

These capabilities are even more important now that the BWM Convention has been ratified. Since all vessels will need a ballast water treatment system within just a few years, thousands of vessels will be competing for the few resources that exist.

Many suppliers have delivered only a handful of systems to date, and thus lack the production strength to scale up in the coming years. Others lack the hands-on experience to ensure smooth installation with the many parties involved. To secure a compliant system in time, it is important to look carefully at the supplier’s installed base and track record.

12. Is the system accompanied by a strong global service offering?

The choice of a ballast water treatment system has long-term implications, since the equipment is intended to last the lifetime of the vessel. There will be a need not only for parts, but also for expertise in optimizing the system over many years of operation.

Having easy access to support will make a positive difference in peace of mind and lifecycle cost. Not having it, on the other hand, may affect the vessel’s ability to comply if service cannot be arranged in time. Choosing a supplier with a global service network is critical, and the supplier should ideally have a well-developed service offering specifically for ballast water treatment.

If the vessel is sold down the road, having a system from a recognized supplier with worldwide support may also positively influence the sale price and the number of potential buyers.

Ballast water treatment legislation

Long expected, ballast water treatment regulations are now taking effect. The IMO Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention has been ratified and U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) legislation is already in force. This makes selecting a treatment system an urgent matter.

Ballast water treatment

The IMO BWM Convention

Adopted in 2004, the BWM Convention is known officially as the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ship’s Ballast Water and Sediments. Though it took many years to ratify, its introduction triggered the development of today’s range of treatment systems.

Since its ratification in September 2016, the BWM Convention has made ballast water treatment a major issue worldwide. Newbuilds will require type-approved treatment systems as of September 2017, while existing vessels will need to have them retrofitted by their first vessel renewal survey after that date. In essence, all vessels will have to install a treatment system within a period of around five years.

Because the BWM Convention was established when less was known about the control mechanisms needed in ballast water treatment, IMO type approval certificates have developed over time. Certificates issued after 2014 offer more detail about the operating limitations of a system, such as salinity, temperature and UV transmittance levels. Any certificate issued before this date should be examined critically, and the newest revision of a certificate should always be sought.

Today the BWM Convention is interpreted in a more-or-less uniform way by third-party testing bodies worldwide, who strive to ensure a high degree of transparency in all testing procedures.

The USCG Ballast Water Discharge Standard

Most notable among the many national ballast water treatment regulations, the USCG Ballast Water Discharge Standard has been in force since June 2012. As of December 2013, all new vessels wishing to deballast in United States waters must comply, with requirements for existing vessels following thereafter. During an initial period, certain IMO-approved systems are approved for use in United States waters as Alternative Management Systems (AMS).

Systems submitted for USCG type approval must currently be tested according to the CMFDA/FDA staining method. The systems must be well developed when testing is performed, and the tests must be conducted by an independent third party. This degree of transparency adds credibility to the test results. In addition, there are more specific requirements on the monitoring of operating parameters during USCG tests.

To date only a handful of ballast water treatment systems have received USCG type approval, including PureBallast 3.1. Future acceptance of the most probable number (MPN) testing method, which is more appropriate for UV-based systems like PureBallast 3.1, would allow the continued use of some systems approved as AMS today.

Stay updated about ballast water treatment

Subscribe to our newsletter
Alfa Laval has 10 years of experience in ballast water treatment. Through our newsletter we will keep you aware of important developments, regulation updates and much more. Subscribe today and stay informed.